<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Egg</title>
	<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/</link>
	<description>Zopa blog - updates, team, news, life and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Egg Card Puns -- General Credit Card News</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-107913</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-107913</guid>
					<description>[...] Bad Egg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bad Egg [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PoohBah</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-16579</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-16579</guid>
					<description>I would not agree that the information was inadequate - I thought it was clear enough, and many users would ignore it even if it was in six foot high flashing neon letters - but I do agree that charging a minimum amount of interest is unreasonable. Egg does not even have the flimsy excuse that it costs money to post a statement.

However, Egg is not alone. Royal Bank of Scotland does it too, and perhaps there are others.

More worrying is the trend for interest rates to be ramped up steeply, especially when a borrower has a nice juicy balance which they are unlikely to be able to pay off quickly.  This is of course a response to the credit card companies being forced to reduce their penalty charges, and does rather prove that the charges were not merely a deterrent, but a lucrative source of income.  The difference is that a penalty charge is effectively a voluntary fee, easily avoided, while increased ongoing interest for an existing borrower is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not agree that the information was inadequate - I thought it was clear enough, and many users would ignore it even if it was in six foot high flashing neon letters - but I do agree that charging a minimum amount of interest is unreasonable. Egg does not even have the flimsy excuse that it costs money to post a statement.</p>
<p>However, Egg is not alone. Royal Bank of Scotland does it too, and perhaps there are others.</p>
<p>More worrying is the trend for interest rates to be ramped up steeply, especially when a borrower has a nice juicy balance which they are unlikely to be able to pay off quickly.  This is of course a response to the credit card companies being forced to reduce their penalty charges, and does rather prove that the charges were not merely a deterrent, but a lucrative source of income.  The difference is that a penalty charge is effectively a voluntary fee, easily avoided, while increased ongoing interest for an existing borrower is not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roderik</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-11959</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-11959</guid>
					<description>Thanks for reading their Ts&#38;Cs update for us, I hadn't done it! Closing my account with them when I finish this message. 50p interest, that's just evil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading their Ts&amp;Cs update for us, I hadn&#8217;t done it! Closing my account with them when I finish this message. 50p interest, that&#8217;s just evil
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ross Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-11958</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2006/07/25/bad-egg/#comment-11958</guid>
					<description>Introducing new fees and costs with inadequate information given out to or communication with regular users? I'm sure I have heard that before, somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introducing new fees and costs with inadequate information given out to or communication with regular users? I&#8217;m sure I have heard that before, somewhere.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
