<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slice of pie chart anyone?</title>
	<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/</link>
	<description>Zopa blog - updates, team, news, life and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mac</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-135937</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-135937</guid>
					<description>I was about to write that to place borrowers and lenders in direct communication, while in a social lending agreement, *would* be a terrible, terrible idea.

I was about to comment that scores of borrowers *would*, consciously or subconsciously, appeal to the social aspect of the relationship in order to prioritize other debts, rendering this lending plan as notorious as lending to friends and family.

After doing a bit of follow-up reading (before commenting, for once) I found that none of the above will be a problem. Going through with this comment to prevent others from coming to similar assumptions :).

Because Zopa diversifies lenders' contributions into 50 quid increments across multiple loans, emotive exchanges and negative sensitivities are all but nullified. Well done, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to write that to place borrowers and lenders in direct communication, while in a social lending agreement, *would* be a terrible, terrible idea.</p>
<p>I was about to comment that scores of borrowers *would*, consciously or subconsciously, appeal to the social aspect of the relationship in order to prioritize other debts, rendering this lending plan as notorious as lending to friends and family.</p>
<p>After doing a bit of follow-up reading (before commenting, for once) I found that none of the above will be a problem. Going through with this comment to prevent others from coming to similar assumptions <img src='http://blog.zopa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Because Zopa diversifies lenders&#8217; contributions into 50 quid increments across multiple loans, emotive exchanges and negative sensitivities are all but nullified. Well done, guys!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon DJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-130804</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-130804</guid>
					<description>Great stuff - can't wait to hear more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff - can&#8217;t wait to hear more!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pages tagged "sociable"</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-130411</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-130411</guid>
					<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Business blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slice of pie chart anyone?</title>
		<link>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-130296</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.zopa.com/archives/2008/09/04/slice-of-pie-chart-anyone/#comment-130296</guid>
					<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Read the rest of this great post here [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
